PLANS · 03 TIERS

Choose a plan based on how you work, not how many line items you buy

PlanSmartAI™ plans are structured around submission volume, review iteration, and collaboration needs—not feature gates. Start where you are today and scale as your workflow grows.

Find Your Fit Talk With Us
01 Essentials Occasional submissions 02 Professional Active plan workflows 03 Enterprise Programs & portfolios

Pricing depends on workload, not feature gates. Compare tiers ↓

01 Tiers

Find your fit by workload, not feature gates

Essentials — occasional submissions

Essentials

For individuals and small teams with occasional submissions

A modest monthly credit allowance for analysis runs, sized for occasional projects and light collaboration.

BEST FOR

  • Residential projects
  • Small firms
  • Infrequent or seasonal plan submissions

SUPPORTS

  • Pre-submission review for individual projects
  • Multiple review passes as plans evolve
  • A small number of workspaces or collaborators

TYPICAL

Teams preparing one project at a time who want to catch common issues before formal review.

MOST POPULAR

Professional — active plan workflows

Professional

For active firms managing steady plan volume

A higher monthly credit allowance and more review headroom per project for teams with steady submission volume.

BEST FOR

  • Architecture or engineering firms
  • Tenant improvement projects
  • Teams juggling multiple active submissions

SUPPORTS

  • Higher review throughput per project
  • Collaboration across teams and projects
  • Broader discipline coverage for coordination

TYPICAL

Firms standardizing submission quality across repeatable workflows without slowing delivery.

Enterprise — programs and portfolios

Enterprise

For organizations managing programs, portfolios, or evaluations

The largest included monthly credit allowance and highest per-project review limits for programs that need predictable capacity.

BEST FOR

  • Large firms
  • Multi-office teams
  • Municipal or enterprise-scale evaluations

SUPPORTS

  • Large submission volumes
  • Custom configuration aligned to internal standards
  • Integration and advanced access options

TYPICAL

Organizations embedding pre-submission validation into broader planning or review strategies.

Get started with a Free Trial

02 How to think

Pricing built around workload, not surprises

01

How often you submit plans

02

How many review iterations you typically run

03

How many people or projects you manage at once

You don’t need to estimate every detail up front. Plans are structured so teams can run multiple pre-submission reviews, make revisions, and re-review with confidence—without changing how they submit to agencies.

WHAT WE AVOID

  • Locking teams into rigid, per-submission contracts
  • Penalizing iteration during plan prep
  • Forcing upgrades prematurely

03 Foundation

How usage fits your workflow

Workload concepts and review mechanics are explained on How It Works. This page focuses on fit, capacity, and when to upgrade.

Review how workflows map to usage

04 Included

What all plans share

  • The ability to run pre-submission plan reviews
  • Support for multiple review passes per project
  • Findings focused on common documentation and coordination gaps
  • A workflow that ends at submission—without interfering in municipal review

Plans differ by scale and capacity, not by restricting core functionality.

05 Upgrade

Upgrade when your workflow changes

  • 01 Submission volume increases
  • 02 More projects overlap in time
  • 03 More collaborators are involved
  • 04 Broader coordination is required

06 Transparency

Pricing details, when you’re ready

Exact pricing depends on:

  • 01 Plan tier
  • 02 Billing structure (monthly)
  • 03 Any organization-specific needs

Rather than publishing static prices that rarely reflect real usage, we walk teams through options to make sure fit comes before cost.

07 FAQ

Common questions

A review evaluates plan set documents against building codes and produces an evaluated report.

Plans change. Re-running a review after targeted edits is expected so teams can confirm improvements before filing.

Your credits are based on the number of pages analyzed through the platform. Each page reviewed during the compliance and code analysis process counts toward your available credits.

Tiers differ by included capacity (reviews, credits, workspaces, and collaboration). We help you pick a tier that matches overlap, volume, and team size—then adjust as you grow.

→ Next step

Start where you are

Whether you submit plans occasionally or manage an active pipeline, PlanSmartAI is designed to meet you upstream—then scale with your needs.

Request a Walkthrough